Monday, March 24, 2008

Richardson Plays Eddie Haskell

A favorite television show as I grew up was Leave It to Beaver. June and Ward Clever, raising their sons Wally and Theodore (Beaver), were written as the model American family. One character in the show, Wally's friend Eddie Haskell, was a weasel kind of guy. The phrase "Eddie Haskell" is known to refer to an insincere brown-noser", according to Wikipedia. "Eddie's two-faced style was also typified by his efforts to curry favor by talking to adults at the level he thought they would respect." June and Ward Clever saw the transparency of Haskell's weasel ways yet rarely called him on them.

Friday, at a rally in Oregon, former Clinton administration cabinet member, current New Mexico governor, Bill Richardson endorsed Barack Obama for President. This event was played up, excessively so, mostly to deflect some of the attention Obama's campaign has endured over the Jeremiah Wright flap. Richardson ran for the presidency himself but was unable to catch on with the Democratic primary voters. I think even the Democrats voting in the primaries saw the true Bill Richardson character. Just like Mike Huckabee, he was enjoying the attention and over-stayed his time in the campaign.

Richardson's endorsement was a big ole 'gotcha' moment for Hillary Clinton. As recently as Super Bowl Sunday, Richard was photographed and enjoyed the publicity of spending the afternoon with former President Bill Clinton, watching the game together in New Mexico. Richardson, a Super Delegate in the Democratic Party, was said to be sending signals that he was on board the Hillary Express.

Let's remember, Richardson was brought into the spotlight of national news as a member of Bill Clinton's administration. Bill did the whole 'my administration will look like America' thing. So, instead of concentrating on the most qualified cabinet appointments, it was all about symbols. Richardson was brought on from the House of Representatives. He was the Hispanic guy. Technically he's only Hispanic on his mother's side, but still. He was Secretary of Energy - no accomplishments - and then over to the U.N. as our representative.

Richardson ran for President this election cycle on these credentials. He was elected governor of New Mexico on these credentials. Were it not for Bill Clinton, Richardson would probably still be just another member of the House of Representatives. His main statement during his campaign for President was that he would immediately withdraw troops from Iraq and he would go around the world negotiating with every dictator known to man. He's all about the talking. Never mind that all his previous talking didn't stop the lead up to 9/11. He and Madeleine Albright were a swell team.

To pour a bit of salt into the wound to Hillary's campaign, Richardson deviated a bit from the standard protocol of diplomats. Richardson, previously self-promoted as an incredibly gifted diplomat, was interviewed by Lester Holt this past weekend. From NewsBusters.org : "Holt: Before we talk about what was behind your endorsement of Obama, I've got to ask you about the phone call you had to make on Thursday to Senator Clinton. You're friends with the Clintons, you worked for Bill Clinton in his administration. What was the phone call like?

Bill Richardson: Well [chortling], I've had better phone calls. I talked to Senator Clinton about 9 o'clock, and I told her, and you know, she was, she was disappointed. It was a little bit heated. She asked me why, I gave her the reasons..."

Standard diplomatic protocol, and just plain good manners, in this type of situation, would have Richardson do the standard response that he wouldn't blab about a personal phone call. But no. Richardson had to get in the jab that Hillary was angry. Was that an unusual response on her part? Why would it be? Up until that phone call, she was lead to believe Richardson was supporting her.

Eddie Haskell. Bill Richardson is Eddie Haskell.

So, who knows what kind of deal Richardson cut with Obama. Maybe he'll be offered a good gig with him. Richardson seems to have waited until he felt Obama will be the clear winner of the nomination and went with that team. And, he got the publicity at the campaign rally from the television networks and newspapers. He and Obama did the man hug three times on that stage.

It was all typical smarmy stuff from the campaign above the fray. There are lots of former Clinton people in Obama's campaign. They've shown a bit more class in how their participation has been handled.

Nice going, Eddie.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm completely perplexed by this entire post. Richardson - no accomplishments?? Relaying the uncomfortableness of a phone call that was already widely assumed to have been a difficult one to make? Commenting on it after he was compared to Judas by a member of his own party? Having the fortitude to make up his own mind instead of feeling a lifetime blood tie/obligation to sway with the Clintons on the basis of a job offer a decade or more ago? These things show a *lack* of character?

Completely perplexed.

And I also find it telling that every Republican going is talking about Obama and has been for two solid weeks. Rush is such the valiant "American" with his "Operation Chaos" that it took him 2 1/2 hours in to even metion the anniversary of the war the other day. I've heard little to nothing from them on McCain.

Anonymous said...

I see no reason for confusion in this post; a citizen is making a commentary on an actual event. The underlying proposition is that an individual who has made his entire career from his association with what we are now calling “The Clinton Legacy,” suddenly changes direction and supports Clinton’s adversary. Some people who value such bizarre concepts as loyalty, integrity, devotion to political ideology, might regard this as an interesting development.

What I find baffling are people who are unable to discuss political or social issues without introducing the moral relativist argument.

Good post, Karen.

Anonymous said...

Ad least Eddie Haskell well clean shaven - that is more than I can say for Richardson. He looks like a wannabee overgrown hippie gone wild.

I never liked him so his supporting Obama yo mama is no surprise.

What surprises me is how horrible a judge of character the Clinton's are. I almost felt sorry for them until I realized they are just as dumb as the rest of the koolaid drinkers.

Incognito said...

well said Mustang! Jennifer is obviously an Obama-ite, one of the many blind followers who fail to see the true darkness within that man.

Richardson is an opportunist. Politics as usual.

Great post, Karen.

Z said...

Karen, you almost put me off one of my old favorite shows forever! But, of course, who ever liked Eddie Haskell? You're right....you almost say his name with a snarl, don't you?!
Richardson (snarl) can back anyone he wants, but he sure handled this badly....particularly his comment about how the phone conversation went. No wonder the Clintons are so ticked off. Just stay QUIET, Bill....it's obvious you're pandering for a job with Obama. I'd be a little less proud were I you.

Anonymous said...

I was surprised when I heard that he threw his support Obama's way. I still feel that Clinton is somehow going to strangle hold the "super delegates" and take this thing. We shall see.

Never have understood the whole "super delegate" thing the Democrats do. Republicans don't feel the need to make things confusing.

Great post Karen.

The WordSmith from Nantucket said...

Never have understood the whole "super delegate" thing the Democrats do.

It takes the decision out of the hands of the people, you know?

Z said...

Wordsmith....good point. Typical Democrats. Didn't Hillary say something like "they don't know what's good for them?" Wish I could find the exact quote.

Suzan..i'm confused on it, too.

GrEaT sAtAn'S gIrLfRiEnD said...

Well, being totally in the dark to the "Leave it to Beaver" mention (could they really get away with calling a show THAT way back then!!? Certainly been rebranded since).

Richardson is 1st and foremost a pol. They thrive on self aggrandizment, opportunity and even chance.

He does have some accomplishments to his cred in the gov at State (though maybe not great or even good accomps - after all - NoKo says they were busy breaking oaths as his ride left the tarmac at Pyongyang) and he was elected as the Gov.

Jennifer is correct about fortiness and mind making upping.

Her point about GOPer's and their Radio buds may be the fact that they are openly enjoying watching the sure win Dems become the sure losers.

Ron Simpson said...

Obama and Hillary are like two rats fighting for scraps on a sinking ship.
Richardson's actions do not surprise me. He is an opportunistic hack. Like all hacks, he will wait until he sees a winning side and jump on it. I have no respect for his decision. Had he done it as soon as he dropped out of the race, then he woudl deserve some respect. Maybe. Just a little. A very, very little.

Jenn....pull a clue outta the clue bag.

Anonymous said...

Oh yes, I am a card carrying member of the cult of Obama, as Karen knows well. She also knows I am not perplexed by her expressing herself. I am perplexed by her characterization of Richardson.

If a Republican had the balls to stand against conventional wisdom and follow his principles instead of his former employer in some misguided loyalty moment, he or she would be rejoiced over as a Person Of Character and Integrity and not reviled as an opportunisit hack. It's happened before. It will happen again. What's good for the GOP isn't so attractive on the Dems.

Seeing as I have no idea what the hell a moral relavist argument is, I find it an amusing descriptive of my comment. But hey. Whatever floats your boat.

I am waiting very patiently for Karen and my other GOP friends to blog in support of their positions, because I'm interested in that. The rabid blather, not so much.

I may as well go all out with the stereotype here: make conversation, not war.

Love you to bits, Karen.

xo
:-)