Saturday, September 06, 2008

Obama Drops Boycott of Fox News Channel

Senator Barack Obama broke his boycott of Fox News Channel and sat down for an interview with Bill O'Reilly. The interview just happened to take place on the final day of the Republican National Convention. In a play to capture a bit of attention from the wildly successful convention speech from Governor Sarah Palin the night before, the audience is told by the campaign that it was simply the only time the Senator had available.

The interview is being shown in segments over multiple nights. Some from Fox News who have watched the interview say Obama looks comfortable and at ease. Others say he stammers over answers and seems tentative. Sounds like a balanced review.

In the Washington Post, an article appeared by Howard Kurtz on September 3. Kurtz writes of a secret meeting between Obama and Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes and Rpert Murdock, the network's owner which happened three months ago. The meeting happened at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in Manhattan and Obama brought with him David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs.

"I just wanted to know if I'm going to get a fair shake from Fox News Channel, " Ailes recalled him saying. "Senator, you're the one who boycotted us," Ailes says he replied. We're not the ones who boycotted you. Nor did we retaliate for your boycott."

You may remember it was John Edwards who initially demanded all Democrat presidential candidates boycott Fox News, at the insistence of the far left blogs. Rather than show political courage and independence - some say change- the Democrat candidates fell into line and allowed themselves to be dictated to for fear of loss of support.

Ailes says, "he tried to clear the air with the Democratic senator by saying that his organization was determined to be fair but would not be 'in the tank' for Obama's campaign." This is a distinct difference between Fox News and the other media outlets. By doing honest evaluation of the Obama campaign and the candidate's personal story and family life, Obama "expressed concern about the way Fox was covering him."

"As Ailes recalls it, he responded to Obama's concerns about fairness by saying that "there are opinion shows and there are news shows." "Asked to assess the sit-down, Ailes said: "I wanted him to understand that we're a real journalism organization and we're going to cover what's there. We're not out to get him...Neither of us was overly aggressive but neither of us blinked."

"Ailes says he told the senator that there would be no "embarrassing or underhanded stuff" in the interview and that if he had any overall concerns about Fox's treatment in the future, he should call Ailes directly."

O'Reilly invited Obama to appear on his cable opinion show 9 months ago. At the time, Obama agreed to do so. What better time to finally have a free slot in his calendar than the final night of the Republican convention?

John McCain ran an ad on television congratulating Obama and his success on the final night of the Democrat convention. Obama does a personal interview for personal publicity.

Country First? Change?

5 comments:

GrEaT sAtAn'S gIrLfRiEnD said...

The little tease seen about Surge was maddening. It was a weak play of Woodwards new book. The interesting thing about it is that Surge totally didnt matter. It was everybody but American GI's and Marines that made it happen. Even giving Mookie praise for stepping back from the Abyss.

Rumour has it the cat who thought up surge - Dr Frederick Kagan is coming out soon with a fun, fact filled counter attack that hopefully stops all this history re write jazz in it's tracks.

Back on topic though, that was was a wickedly correct and clever conclusion Karen - service to something larger than self. And as Sarracuda says "There is only one man who has fought for America in this race!"

Anonymous said...

McCain paid serious campaign coin to interject his face into the conversation on the Thursday of the DNC convention.

Obama sat for a lengthy interview on the same day of the RNC party, which was taped. Parts 2-4 will air Monday through Wednesday of next week.

Unless I missed the memo naming Obama head of programming for Fox News, the decision to air part one Thursday night was made by O'Reilly and Fox.

Rick Frea said...

Great report. I'm not sure that going on O'Reily on the republican's night may turn off some independents to Obama. Obviously, it didn't take any of the thunder away from McCain -- 40 million viewers.

Karen Townsend said...

The first installment was brillant for ratings. And for Obama to go out and actually claim at a brief presser that he is running his campaign and the financial distribution. What a joke. That was to counter Sarah Palin's experience with local and state budgets.

And for McCain paying for the ad? Yes, he pays his own way. That's how it's suppose to be.

Looking forward to Kagan's response. I'm doing a bit of research into an interesting article I just came across about the connection between Obama's rise and a Tx man who introduced Obama to NY money and connections to get into Harvard.

Z said...

Anybody want to "ponder" the truth about O'Reilly? With contrite, rather shy behavior, he explained how the interview HAD to air that night because THAT was 'the only time Obama had in his busy schedule'.

Wait. The thing was TAPED, not live. Tape it any time.....tape it RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF McCAIN's speech..who cares? But SHOW IT that night? WHY?

Get my drift? O'Reilly was deadly disengenuous on this one...SO big time.

"I'm only airing it then because that's the only time obama had" ...remember that's what he said? And he only shows five minutes? WHY?

RATINGS.
But, of course, VERY few are mentioning Obama's appearance and what he said!! This worked for Obama almost as well as McCain's nomination of Palin drowning out his acceptance speech so much we haven't heard a WORD about it since, right?

Unreal. great post, Karen.